Individual health is determined not
only by biological/inborn factors but also socio-cultural factors. As health is
considered a social good and a valuable asset to be achieved in our societies, it
becomes important to understand health from the macro-level point of view. Recently,
research on the impact of the social resources on health and disease has been
increased. This is because social resources are highly related to the health
status such as mental and physical disorder or mortality (Cobb, 1976). Research
on social resources can be divided into two main subjects, which are social
network and social supports. Researchers who study on the social network focus on
the impact of the structure of the interpersonal relationship on health
conditions such as magnitude, reciprocity and frequency of the personal relationship.
In contrast, researchers studying social supports on health address how
interpersonal resources such as emotional, cognitive and material supports affect
individual health conditions (Cohen & Wills, 1985; Jacobson, 1986).
According to Berkman and Syme(1979), a social network has a positive effect on various
health indexes. For example, it was found that a socially-cohesive society
showed relatively lower disease incident rate compared with an individual-based
society in case other economic and social environments are similar between two
societies. With regards to the effect of the social supports on health, it was
found that social supports have both main effect and buffering effect on
health. Researchers baking up the main effect (direct effect) of the social
supports argue that social supports always efficiently contribute to reducing a
stress level regardless of the level of stress. However, those who support for
the buffering effect of the social supports claim that social supports attenuate
a stress level only when the level is high (Stachour, 1998).
Smith(1992) argued that high cardiovascular risk can be attributable to the
less social supports. Specifically, the more people have hostility towards
others, the less social supports they receive from others, and, in turn, the
interpersonal conflict increases cardiovascular disease. Culture is another key component which
affects health condition. According to the research on the relationship between
culture and health by Triandis, Bontempo, Villareal, Asai and Lucca(1988), it
was found that a physical disease incident rate was low in the collectivistic
culture compared with in the individualistic culture in case other
socio-economic conditions are similar between those cultures. It could be
interpreted that since unity and harmony are emphasized more in the
collectivistic culture, it provides more social supports as well as reduces competitions
and stress level that people experience. Understanding health as a
socioculturally-generated entity will contribute to find a way to improve
health conditions. It will help us to figure out what an important role
societies play in individual health and how societies can help individuals to
achieve their optimal health. It would be desirable to expand our view on
health by studying more in depth about the relation between health and socio-cultural
factors.
1) Cobb, S. (1976). Presidential
Address-1976. Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic
medicine, 38(5), 300-314.
2) Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985).
Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological bulletin,
98(2), 310.
4) Smith, T. W. (1992). Hostility and
health: current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis. Health psychology,
11(3), 139.
5) Stachour, V., & Shapiro, J. (1998). The role of social support in mediating stress and illness.
6) Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.