Who knows better? It’s not only an ethical issue; it is also
social, economic, environmental, and cultural issue. The problem that prof
Amber raise in his lecture about the sex workers and using condoms raise that
issue to my mind, by asking them what they really need and try to understand
the socio-economic back ground for them
he improve their risk behavior.
We assume as a health workers that we knows better than the
community we are working with, we assume causes, precipitating factors,
correlations and decide the best solutions. Since we are the experts in the
science, we can decide the best for them. In fact, that is not usually the
case. Studies and Science is about probability not certainty, we must know that
well. We try our best but at the same time we should take in consideration that
we still do not know a lot.
Dose the community knows best? Sometimes yes, but other times
no. The communities over time developed their knowledge by try and error, as
humans we gain the ability to survive and develop by experience. The natural
selection keeps those who had the right choices. Cumulative experiences of the
communities are as much important as the science probabilities.
We should consider ourselves as a part of the community not
separate. We all know better. When we conduct a study or planning an
intervention, we should consider the ethical issue, the cultural back ground,
the socio-economic status, the demographic status or whatever, not only from
our opinion but also from the opinion side of the community under the study. This
will gives us a better chance to discover the salient and hidden factors that
contribute in the problem. Our
collective experience can really merge together to produce a better choice. So,
the right question is not who knows better? It is how we decide the best
interest?
As a global health worker, I think we should not put
assumptions or previous judgments on the communities that we are working with. Previous assumption will hide the real causes and risk
factors that may have high impact on the problem. It also may hinder some simple
solution that we can figure it out by just being more open minded and accepting
to the community habits and background. People trust those who listen to them
and work for their interest and distrust those who are deaf to their concerns.
Excellent. This process is called as surrendering our "expertise" and "privileges" before the community. By doing that, we create trust, confidence and support bases.
ReplyDeleteI like your thoughts on this issue of experts via a via communities of intervention programs. As you rightly said, many at times we assume experts know it all, those theories, techniques etc... but we can also count the many times projects or some interventions failed to yield the expected results and frustrations and mistrust lingering behind... The PROCEDE-PROCEED MODEL PLANNING coupled with recent much advocated community participatory approaches would surely be the way to go in seeing the larger and more important pictures of problems before applying any tools as means of interventions. The best interest of any project, intervention or action plan should be a concerted efforts, deliberations and engagement of concerned stakeholders for better and sustainable results.
ReplyDelete