SARS and Ebola outbreak caused the world to wake up
and become aware that disease is not sequestered within a geographical
boundary. However the poor and poorer
countries bear the burden of these diseases. As money is being funnel into
cures and interventions of these diseases, diabetes, CVD and other noncommunicable
diseases (NCDs) are outpacing globalization of infectious disease because: (1)
there is a weak compatibility with existing security frameworks (2) difficult
to treat because of multiple determinants leading to difficulties in
prevention, containment or treatment and (3) the threat is not immediate and
may be deferred.
In the past frameworks were not developed to treat
NCDs because they were considered prevalent cases and not new case (incidence)
or recurring cases. Because the etiology of the disease and modifying factors
were varied. Today WHO and others are taking a systematic look at frameworks
and assessment of an integrated surveillance of NCD to address policy and
strategy developments. So why were NCD overlooked and underestimated.
NCD’s were endemic to western and developed countries,
however, with the increase in western lifestyle in developing countries the
incidence of NCDs began to rise. Globalization, that supposed free flow of
trade, resource etc., does not take into account the culture, norms or
lifestyle of developing countries. While the model of globalization insist that
we are all free and equal to trade, the burden of those trade deficits impacts
the developing world at a greater rate.
Take for instance the fact that with globalization, countries with a
population that depended on farming and producing fresh food and open markets
are now relying on canned imports and fast food from global corporations like
McDonalds, KFC. This is unsustainable because many in the developing world live
a lifestyle that is slower than that of the developing world. Dietary norms that were followed in
developing countries are now being replaced by that of the western world. The act
of farming and gardening and walking to an open market provided necessary exercise
and community interaction. The added sugars, fats, and substrates to packaged
food, without the necessary investment in energy expenditure creates risk
factors for NCDs.
While the developed world is worried about non NCDs crossing
border we were systematically introducing the agents of NCD into to the
developing world. The developing world
has now has to face the impact of NDs as well as other communicable diseases on
an already impoverished economy and health care system. Globalization comes as
a cost, and many times the developing world is the one left to pay the bill
without the benefits.
Nice, critical post. The world is seeing so many transitions and being globally connected has not only provided growth and market opportunities but also the dark side of it. In many rural areas of the south, there is massive shifts in food/ dietary practices and others which are setting in course a huge epidemiological transition which we will experience in years to come.
ReplyDeleteChristelene, when I think of globalization and disease, I look at what happened to the Native Americans of North America. When I was in undergraduate, I took a class on Native American History & Culture. This wonderful class went into detail about all of the issues the English brought to this land. Smallpox was a particularly awful disease that affected the Native American population. I know you were focusing on NCDs, but I believe the issue is globalization is not favorable for disease control. To address the NCDs, I think we will have to go back to trying to make a good definition for global health. Nations and other countries will have to have this in common to figure out what issue to address.
ReplyDelete