I recently finished reading the book, The Blue Zones: 9 Lessons For Living Longer from the people who've lived the longest. Blue zones are defined as pockets in the world where people live measurably longer lives and have a higher rate of centenarians- people who live until 100 years of age. The story is told by the Author and describes his experiences visiting each of the 5 blue zones in the world: Sardinia, Italy; Loma Linda, California; Okinawa, Japan; Nicoya, Costa Rica; and Ikaria, Greece. The stories he told were absolutely mind-blowing. At the end of each chapter, the lessons of that blue zone were listed. How were these people living so long?
Although each blue zone had there own unique characteristics and practices, there were a few common themes. First, all of the zones place high emphasis on the importance of spending time with friends and family. All of the communities are very close, they help each other out, and there is a sense of comfort and safety within their community. Next, mostly all zones consumed limited amounts of meat or were vegetarians. They grew just about all of their food in gardens, which means they barely ever ate processed foods- it was all organic and had to be prepared. Third, they all lived very active lifestyles. Although some did exercise by biking and weight lifting, their main forms of physical activity was walking and performing their daily tasks such as gardening. It was stressed that moderate-level exercise is all that is necessary and this should come from just making your daily life more active, not going to the gym for 1 hour everyday and then remaining sedentary for the rest of the day. The last thing they all seemed to have in common, which was called a different thing in each zone, was having a strong sense of purpose in life/ a reason to wake up in the morning.
The quality of these people's lives were very high. They suffered from much lower rates of morbidity and mortality, and they were genuinely happy. However, already, the rates of centenarians are expected to decline with more urbanization in these areas. Kids are not growing up the same as their parents and grandparents that made it to this old age. Do you think it is even possible to adopt a lifestyle similar to those in the blue zones? Or is it impossible because of how our lives and environments are structured? Instead of living active lifestyles and eating highly plant-based diets, we are overwhelmed with technology that makes us lazy and convenience foods that are necessary for our busy work weeks.
Hi Hannah,
ReplyDeleteGreat post, I will certainly look for this book as I am very interested to read more. Some questions for thought as I read through your description came up. How was the land and climate in the regions associated with the amount and variety of crops they can plant? Availability of such resources in order to be able to produce agriculture can be important; things like weather, types of soil and land can all be associated with a region's ability to live the way some of those regions do, which are all things beyond human control in remote regions that don't see such statistics. Second, what about healthcare access in those places? Was there appropriate access to treatment and information? Did it mention that at all? It would be great to assess the nutrition and health information knowledge in those regions. And last is the sense of purpose, which I love how the author included that. This made me think of the social cognitive theory where motivation, encouraging support from others and 'success' of others around you can all have a positive impact on self efficacy of an individual. This is demonstrated in the sense of community that the author talks about as was seen as a common theme in all five regions.
Is it possible for us to live such a lifestyle you ask? Yes, definitely. For many North Americans, it is a matter of prioritizing what health choices we make. Taking that ten minute walk after we eat, grabbing the extra serving of vegetables with every meal etc. are all choices we can make. What is important is to note that these regions were set in the lifestyle and lived this in their day to day; something that we need to consider. In order to see these types of results, it needs to be integrated into our day to day for a long period of time (no short term, no shortcuts). Also, finding our sense of purpose and meaning, together with being around people who support that purpose is all a choice as well and something we should consider as equally as important as having that extra serving of vegetables. It is all one picture for health as we mentioned in our very first class, not just the body!
Hannah, I’m happy you finished your book! I have heard of these “blue zones” before but never knew the reasons behind them. Your questions bring up a good point and I agree with Amy, I don’t think we HAVE to live such sedentary lives, but I do think it is the easiest route. It is the way our environment is structured, but I feel we can overcome it.
ReplyDeleteAs I am sitting back home passively watching the Kardashians (my sister is obsessed), one of the characters is complaining about his weight and the mom is saying, “You need to eat right and exercise more” and another character goes “Everyone says that though! Duh, we get it.” Please excuse my millennial language there, but it makes a good point here. We do have to tell ourselves this, “eat healthy and exercise,” because it isn’t already a part of our daily lives. I think we, as health professionals, need a fresh approach to the stale saying. Perhaps if we changed the mindset of the masses to that of the centennials, of making your daily routine more active and eating more plant-based foods, there could be some progress toward a healthier population? I like this idea.
A question back at you, what is the 80% rule?
Hannah,
ReplyDeleteI have always been interested in the blue zones, but more some from a socio-economic perspective. Do these people work, how much do they have saved, what's their education background, what's their financial situation? All of the things that you talk about does truly affect how well and long we live, but, I find that it is those who have the financial resources that are able to lead this lifestyle. The age of the group is also helpful. If they made enough money to retire early and live that type of lifestyle it is great. California is quite an expensive place so how are they able to afford to live? Is their house paid for or do they live in apartments? Why is this model not implemented more across the board?
I have more questions than answers, but again all of this behavior change depends on resources. Can someone who don't have the resources eat well and healthy and exercise and plant a garden. I try to plant a garden every spring and it take quite a bit of work and with school, work and everything else I usually end up neglecting the garden. I love gardening but I have time constraints, and it's not attainable at the moment. I could reduce the number of hours working, but that also reduces pay and put my family in a negative financial situation that causes stress. So there are a lot of factors that play into getting to this blue-zone.