Saturday, September 24, 2016

Globalization and Gender Inequality

Although some claim that globalization has a global long term positive health and social influences by increasing growth rates, employment and financial autonomy, it has been shown that this “trickle down” theory is not correct. Money and wealth are definitely appropriate and beneficial to those on the top of the socioeconomic gradient. However, the assumption that such financial and social benefits will trickle down to the needy is not a real fact.

 Despite that both genders in the low socioeconomic gradient are negatively affected by globalization, women seem to be more at risk. Women are considered as “shock absorbers” of the economy in the developing countries. Although our readings last week addressed lower wage, dead end jobs, food insecurity and other financial, health and social factors as negative influences of globalization on women, I want to target the psychological aspect.

Being from one of the developing countries, I personally encountered the taste of inequality when I was declined my right to be honored as a top student in the high school due to not being among regular school students. Homeschooling was treated as an option for criminals, elders or FEMALES! The Egyptian community, till now, has abasement thinking to homeschooling females. When I started working and become affiliated with the department of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, I suffered again the gender inequality problem. Despite being highly educated, some of my colleagues and professors treated me in a way of being a person with half efficiency, only, due to being a working wife and a mother. It took me a couple of years of extreme hard work and stress to prove them wrong.


Although, in the era of globalization, women can have more opportunities, they are usually under threat not only from a financial aspect but also from a psychological one. They are usually under-estimated, ignored and under continuous psychological stress which eventually destroy their health, families, communities and that will, consequently, have serious global implications. Such culture that lead to the social construction of reality in a majority of developing countries that females are low standard citizens should be addressed. In my opinion, It is considered as a severe sort of structural violence and social injustice towards females. Building successful communities and achieving progress in every aspect is mainly based on females who should gain not only their financial rights but also their psychological ones!

2 comments:

  1. Hi Salma,

    Great post! I think taking a look at this in the global health context, women would be a key determinant towards progress in creating effective and sustainable intervention programs. I agree, that women of course have been victim to structural violence in developing countries and still do today. These women however, more often than not, are key drivers towards the household and village economy; raising children, taking care of the family and in some cases are the physical workers of the village. They are the foundation of the family structure in almost all cultures and should be viewed as the main driver of any behavioral and attitude change. Therefore, reaching the women and educating them towards the benefits of taking part in a healthy lifestyle or any intervention program (ex: receiving antiretroviral treatment) and improving their health literacy can be a sustainable way to create positive change as public health professionals. Mothers especially are quite the power house! I remember in my field work the head of the CBO that I was working with said to me "the worse thing you can so for a child is take it away from its mother- you take care of the mother, you take care of an entire village".

    Women will continue to make improvements towards equality, its the public health professionals that will be the driver of this should we all deeply consider the power and influence women have all over the world!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Salma,

    The readings that talked about trickle down economics really interested me. You would think that if the economy grows it would result in better economic prosperity for all. We clearly saw that that was not the case and that the poorest countries become even poorer. Economic growth has been seen to worsen the lives of those at the bottom, and like you said, especially females. We need to focus more on reducing the gap and the bringing the lowest economic levels up, rather than bringing the highest economic levels even higher. I think we need to measure success by the prosperity of women at the lowest levels of society.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.