Personally, I find it extremely frustrating that actors and other non-health professionals, have the ability to sway millions of parents decisions to vaccinate their child. Vaccinations are evidence-based, medically tested, and recommended standards of health care supported by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the American Academy of Pediatrics. It amazes me that these anti-vaccine individuals believe that governmental organizations and medical physicians would be recommending vaccines that were found to have a casual link with any disorder. Laws have been established so that vaccines are rigorously tested before licensed for use. Additionally, vaccines, like the majority of medications, are produce for the majority, not the minority. Most children who get the MMR vaccine don't have any problems. If a child does have a problems the majority of them are minor: fever, mild rash, or minor swelling.
I think I would be more open to the anti-vaccine campaign if health professionals were supporting the effort. However, the fact remains that those said professionals are few and far between. I also would be more apt to support the anti-vaccine campaign if scientific research has shown a connection between vaccines and autism, or any other disorder for that matter. The fact of the matter is, as with any disease or condition, multiple factors can determine an individuals likelihood of getting that particular disease. This is why researching this topic and many others like it is so difficult; everything is every individualized. The Autism Speaks website reports that there are over 100 autism risk genes. These genes can then be turned on or off due to thousands of environmental factors. Autism is a very complex disorder that can't solely be linked to vaccinations.
Has anyone considered that maybe it is a cultural shift that is causing the increased diagnoses of the other disorders (Aspergers, ADD, and ADHD) Carrey claims in his article is a result of vaccinations? We live in a culture where individuals need to be diagnosed and treated. So when a young child has trouble focusing on tasks and exhibiting “abnormal” characteristics we, as a culture, label and treat them. Don’t get me wrong; I believe that there are times that these disorders need treatment. I just think that when disease or illness is in fashion, more individuals are diagnosed with them.
- Measles causes rash, cough, runny nose, eye irritation, and fever. Complications can include ear infection, pneumonia, seizures (jerking or staring), brain damage, and death.
- Mumps causes fever, headache, and swollen glands. Complications can include deafness, meningitis (infection of the brain and spinal cord covering), painful swelling of the testicles or ovaries, and, rarely, death.
- Rubella (German measles) causes rash, mild fever, and arthritis (mostly in women). If a woman gets rubella while she is pregnant, she could have a miscarriage or her baby could be born with serious birth defects.
You have a great point that the rise in autism could be linked to our culture of diagnosing and treating diseases. On that same line of thought, it could also simply be due to better reporting of the illness occurring.
ReplyDeleteThere has been a meta-analysis performed on the subject stating that vaccines are not the cause of autism.1 It seems silly to me to prevent a child from receiving life-saving vaccines when there is no evidence to prove that vaccines cause autism. Lay people are not educated, however, and have not been exposed to the horrors of these diseases.
One of my past professors, Dr. Knipp, studies membrane transporters and pharmacokinetics (what the body does to a drug, including the drug’s metabolism). While this is speculation on his part, he observed something quite interesting. The town he lived in when he worked at Rutgers had a huge increase in the number of cases of autism. The number of cases was at 1 in approximately 30 children developed autism. This is much higher than the national average, which was 1 in 88. He believes it was through toxins in the environment surrounding the town. This to me seems like a much more reasonable explanation for the rise in the number of cases of autism, especially due to the increasing growth of industry and environmental pollutants.
1. Taylor LE, Swerdfeger AL, Eslick GD. Vaccines are not associated with autism: an evidence based meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. Vaccines 2014; 32: 3623-
3629.
The point about the cultural shift is fascinating Hannah. Which again leads us to Nichter and our discussion on the meaning of illness and diseases and our past discussions on the mental health diagnostic manuals. On one hand, I completely agree with Marcel's argument, and understand that vaccines are lifesaving but on the other hand I do feel many diseases and vaccine emphasis is purely driven by the neoliberal markets.
ReplyDelete