Friday, August 23, 2013

Why Culture matters in International Health


What does health mean? In the first class, we discussed this basic but vital question. I was enlightened by your wonderful thoughts all. Also, I think the environment or context in which people’s experiences occur perhaps largely influence their conceptualization of health. For example, the poor, who is struggling with survival and food shortage, might not able to expand the scope to the level of social well-being, such as involvement in the social network. More importantly, why do we talk about the meaning of health? The way in which people conceptualize health, I think, indicate their focus on daily life, current status, their expectation, perceived abilities required in expected life, and tendency of behavior. If people perceive the gap between the current status and expectation towards health, they might adopt different degree of behavior to close the perceived gap. However, the extent that people perceive the gap, the willingness, and abilities of changing behavior, also are influenced by multiple determinants. Among the determinants which are always being debated in social science, cultural force - in the practice of international health - probably is one of the most influential factors on health.  

Culture nurtures a population or a group how to think, how to feel, how to behave, and how to interact. As we live our daily lives, we might be unaware of the culture in most of time. But the thing changes when positioned in international health. So, what is international health? Why is culture important in international health? Based on what I have read so far, I think international health, or global health, transcends the boundaries of nations, focusing on human health in worldwide perspective, with the main goal of improving health outcome, diminishing inequalities, preventing diseases which threat human all over the world (Macfarlane et al., 2008; HM Government, 2008). I think an important point here is that disregarding national borders in international health does not mean ignoring national differences, but rather taking the complex context in local and global into account. In this sense, cultural beliefs/factors are essentially accounting for international health outcomes, since the populations from different countries have their own shared belief systems to direct their action and experience. Thus, we need to develop cultural competence in international health research and practice, in order to effectively develop interventions which consistent with target audience's values across cultures in the world, ultimately improving health outcomes.However, I was thinking one question, in international health practice, how do we, as outsiders, truly get involved in other countries' health issues?

I found the term culture in international health very interesting deriving from my personal experience. As an international student in the U.S., I always encounter culture shock in my life.  As one simple example, I am surprised that people in America like cold beverage with ice very much. In Chinese culture, people think eating too much “cold” food might easily cause disorder or imbalance to the body, such as stomachache or diarrhea. Specifically, if one had a cold, or other “cold” disease, he/she would better not to eat “cold” food such as watermelon. Otherwise the illness will aggravate. Hot - cold is an art in traditional Chinese medicine system. How could we achieve our goals in international health research and campaign if we neglect these kinds of solid cultural norms in different countries? Furthermore, we know culture is not the only key factor in international health. I believe there are many other determinants need to be deeply identified and explored, such as economic policies in different countries, political force, and structural violence which tortures people slowly through depriving their fundamental needs.

Going back to the original question: what does health mean? To me, I think health is not only absence of disease in physical, mental, and social aspects, it also means hope, and desire. For instance, in Chinese culture, people believe if the balance between spirit and body is broken, they might be ill. What’s more, people who embrace hope would gain more energy and motivation to strive, to fight, and to seek a better future. There was an old saying in China: vegetable which has no heart would perish, people who have no hope would die. No hope no health. Both of them are tightly related. People from diverse cultures in the global world have diverse meaning-making processes towards health. Thus, how do we, as researchers, produce hope for people, or develop strategy that consistent with their values and situations in international health issues? The long journey starts...

9 comments:

  1. aha...thanks Lan for the first BLOG post. Awesome thoughts. I love that old Chinese saying and the way you have connected it to health. One reason why international health efforts show sustainability if hope. Researchers from various fields like micro-economics, health behavior are finding that communities are a lot more resilient and complex in their ways and thoughts than we had theorized before. Frequently, we commit the error of concluding that people are uneducated, lack sophistication, ignorant etc....and this is wrong. That this kind of thinking is shallow and wrong has been repeatedly validated by research and documented failures of global health intervention efforts. So, your inclusion of hope and desire in the definition of health brings fresh perspective to the task of improving global community health.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I totally agree with you, Lan. One thing that you mentioned in class that hit really close to home was how Chinese culture prefers their herbal remedies over "Western" medicines. When I was younger (and even today occasionally), with any ailment I suffered from, I vividly remember telling my parents that I didn't want to drink what I called their magic potions because they did not taste good like bubble gum/grape/cherry and they could not explain to me how their herbal remedies worked. During the consideration process and having gone through surgery in the past year, I cannot count how many instances it was mentioned to me that my body, an Asian one, was not the same as a "white", Caucasian one, therefore Western medicines may not work the same for me as it would for an American. I also had to stop drinking cold water and get whatever special ingredients to make healing magic potions weeks before going under the knife. I think one of the major factors to consider, at least in my family, is that for centuries and from generation to generation, natural remedies have been used to cure/alleviate ailments and they worked for the most part. Like in the MIT video we saw, if overtime, symptoms do not go away, it's time to consult an expert (medical doctors). The irony here is that yes, you are going to an expert but deep down, in the case of my father he would just tell me, there's this feeling of distrust/disbelief when they give you a diagnosis. What do you mean they don't know for sure? Is that medicine they prescribed you going to work? My answer is always "Well, if they knew for sure, the field of biomedical research would be dead AND I wouldn't need to go to the doctor!"

    A successful international health program needs to take into account the daily life of populations of interest (and that includes cultural/spiritual/mental/local/social beliefs) in order to be successful. Studying the epidemiological data allows for an issue to be defined; however even before a program should be designed, there should be studies (like the video interviews in the MIT video) and self-immersion in order to truly understand how the population of interest views health and every day life with whatever means are available to them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Awesome, Aurelie! I can't agree with you more! I think it is very interesting to look at the conversation in your family, between two generations. How are people like you influenced by the "original culture" while living in a distinct and dominant American culture, especially in a traditional family? I am very interested in examining the different perceptions toward culture and the effects on health across generations.

      As to the discussion about a effective international health prevention program, I totally agree with you that understanding the population is the key step to make the program successful. However, how far can we go into the culture? Are we able to "truly" understand it? It is tough for us to obtain the trust of the population at first. By the way, Aurelie, what do you think about the trustworthy relationship between researchers and participants who are from totally different cultures? Is it essential to better understand the population?

      Delete
  3. Lan, you bring up a very important concept in the field of public health. Cultural norms will always be a factor in the way we prescribe medicine, recommend treatment and use preventative techniques. The diversity in our class alone, I believe, will bring forth much discussion about how cultural norms and beliefs can impact the end goal.

    My internship this past summer was in a public health department that served primarily low income and minority populations. There was constant discussion about cultural norms, cultural competencies, cultural trainings etc... Managers of the health services we provided were very concerned with training the staff about how to approach patients of different cultures and convince them this vaccine or screening is important, even if their culture did not believe in it. I sometimes doubted the way these situations were handled. Is one general training for nurses and health professionals concerning culture really going to be effective? Is the staff truly understanding why this culture does not believe in vaccines or why this culture believes IUDs can cause cancer? I wish I could answer that question but I have never been on the receiving end of it. However, from my knowledge about program planning and providing effective interventions, I do know that it is essential to involve the target population in the planning process. Otherwise, you are only accomplishing the agenda of the program planners and not the population in need. Therefore, I feel it would be more appropriate to train individuals from that culture as community health workers.

    This all could be applied to international health programs and how countries communicate and provide aid to one another. Western medicine is not going to be suitable for the entire globe, nor will holistic methods. Before considering anything in the planning of a global health program or initiative, it is vital to consider the cultural norms and beliefs that will affect the outcome.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jaci, impressive experience! I found it very thoughtful in your ideas that whether the general training really works. But at least, from a positive perspective, the training may stimulate the staff to raise the awareness of considering the cultural differences among minority populations. I agree with your point that getting the target population engaged in the intervention is vital to achieve an meaningful program planning. It also can include open communication with the population, as well as a dialogic platform for them to speak out their cultural voices and needs. However, it is still a big challenge. Are they willing to engage into the process? We were always discussing "considering the cultural norms". How can we as researchers make international health programs more cost-effective among different nations, standing on a broad viewpoint?

      Delete
  4. Lan, you bring up a very important concept in the field of public health. Cultural norms will always be a factor in the way we prescribe medicine, recommend treatment and use preventative techniques. The diversity in our class alone, I believe, will bring forth much discussion about how cultural norms and beliefs can impact the end goal.

    My internship this past summer was in a public health department that served primarily low income and minority populations. There was constant discussion about cultural norms, cultural competencies, cultural trainings etc... Managers of the health services we provided were very concerned with training the staff about how to approach patients of different cultures and convince them this vaccine or screening is important, even if their culture did not believe in it. I sometimes doubted the way these situations were handled. Is one general training for nurses and health professionals concerning culture really going to be effective? Is the staff truly understanding why this culture does not believe in vaccines or why this culture believes IUDs can cause cancer? I wish I could answer that question but I have never been on the receiving end of it. However, from my knowledge about program planning and providing effective interventions, I do know that it is essential to involve the target population in the planning process. Otherwise, you are only accomplishing the agenda of the program planners and not the population in need. Therefore, I feel it would be more appropriate to train individuals from that culture as community health workers.

    This all could be applied to international health programs and how countries communicate and provide aid to one another. Western medicine is not going to be suitable for the entire globe, nor will holistic methods. Before considering anything in the planning of a global health program or initiative, it is vital to consider the cultural norms and beliefs that will affect the outcome.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow! Very profound Lan. Interesting that I wrote on culture before I read your post. I believe that trying to define health in a culturally competent and sensitive way is tricky. What may be considered healthy in one culture may not be in another culture. The challenge comes as the global health workers tries to reconcile culture and global health initiatives.

    Allow me to start a controversial discussion here. I need your honest input. WHO defines health as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.” (Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19-22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948.)

    In my view, the definition of health cannot be complete without the spiritual dimension of a human being. I know I am wading into sensitive waters but I believe that sensitive issues have to be addressed for there to be meaningful change. It is the spiritual dimension that many global health workers wrestle with and the main reason why health initiatives fail. Many people in Southern Africa refuse vaccinations on religious grounds. International Red Cross operates as International Red Crescent society due to religious reasons. I am suggesting that by ignoring the spiritual aspect of a human being, there is no complete health.

    What is your take?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Onias, your comment really enlightened me a lot! I have the similar opinion with you that spiritual belief is very critical in health issues. Spiritual value provides strong power for the population who believe in it. This power even can transcend the influences of physical and social factors in some cases. It is just my personal opinion that I believe the will is power. Will can support people to resist to the physical pain. Will can uphold people to persist in worse social environment. Based on what I have read and learned, God's will is an important motivation for the followers to take action and adopt health behavior. Thus, how do we deal with the spiritual dimension of individuals? Basically, to be sensitive and respectful to the faith. Respect, I think, is consistently an avenue leading to trust. We need to find appropriate ways to understand it from the perception of an "outsider", although it is hard.

      Delete
  6. Or can we say that spiritual healing plays a strong placebo effect on people who believe in it?

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.